Comments on: The passing of Charlie Wilson–End of an Era https://nationalsecurityforum.org/2010/02/14/the-passing-of-charlie-wilson-end-of-an-era/ Forum for discussing national security issues. Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:55:03 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.2 By: Elvis https://nationalsecurityforum.org/2010/02/14/the-passing-of-charlie-wilson-end-of-an-era/#comment-7 Wed, 08 Jul 2015 04:14:07 +0000 http://nationalsecurityforum.net/?p=102#comment-7 Hello I don’t know if it’s me or your web blog but it is starting sluggish , it took me just like a
few moments in order to load still gmail works completely .

Well, I want to appreciate you for adding beautiful content.

In my opinion it really has already been incredibly helpful
to user who seem to click here. This one is actually wonderful everything that you actually have done
and want to discover a lot more articles from you. I
already have your site book-marked to look at new
stuff you post.

]]> By: dota2hack.org https://nationalsecurityforum.org/2010/02/14/the-passing-of-charlie-wilson-end-of-an-era/#comment-6 Mon, 29 Jun 2015 04:01:58 +0000 http://nationalsecurityforum.net/?p=102#comment-6 Hey Your main web site runs up literally slow for me, I am not sure who’s problem is that however , facebook starts quite
fast. Around the other hand thanks for writing brilliant article.
Almost everyone who actually found this website should have observed this particular article literally handy.
I’m hoping I will be able to get further remarkable information and I should flatter your site by telling you have done remarkable job.
To get more knowledge by content that you publish, I’ve
added this site.

]]> By: Tim Holmes https://nationalsecurityforum.org/2010/02/14/the-passing-of-charlie-wilson-end-of-an-era/#comment-5 Tue, 27 Nov 2012 02:08:37 +0000 http://nationalsecurityforum.net/?p=102#comment-5 I just posted this on a similar article (2008) commentary section in the Washington Post. Charlie Wilson was a positive and persistant part of the process, especially with the Democrat side of the equation, but not an essential one. It would have been interesting what could have happened were he to have disappeared about 1982 for some reason or another.
*************
Let’s get this straight, here the smoking gun of the cold war is revealed to the public in one of the world’s most well known papers (online) and more than four years later no one bothers to post a message.

I have read three of Mr. Kengor’s books on the subject of NSDD-75, and it greatly expands what was already known, how Reagan was head and shoulders beyond everyone, including (at the time) Nixon the presidential Sovietologist, retired. This is meant in the most simple instinctive way of what he wanted to do, take down the USSR (and make it stick), along with increase defense and the economy. He did that, clearly and efficiently. NSDD-75 was the highpoint of the communism goal part.

While Senator Hayakawa’s take was probably correct — that Reagan had great instincts, but often got his homework wrong — in those three main goals he completely successfully cleared the deck. Reagan even confidently directed from the beginning of his presidency “it is time” and that it might work completely in taking down the Soviets. Faith in the right time and place can and does make a huge difference. Almost no one shared his either his vision or views on the subject, and those of the economy, were very viable to the degree he thought. Including a young man about to join the military in 1982, myself. Faith does not need many to share, but it does need one. This is neither necessarily of religious or even positive faith, merely any firmly held belief or conviction. So I personally see as another way to look at NSDD-75 and its background origination.

Instead, we focus on mindless drivel like sensational nonsense of Petraeus boring sex life.

]]>